Use case · Supported evaluation
Agent fan-out control
Croutons can evaluate how planners, agents, retries, retrieval, and tool calls amplify inference consumption across a completed task.
- Problem
- A single user task fans out into many model and tool calls through planners, sub-agents, retries, and retrieval loops.
- Operational symptoms
- Token cost per task far above single-call baselines
- Deep tool-call chains with repeated retrieval
- Retry storms on flaky tools
- Latency dominated by sequential agent steps
- Who experiences it
- Teams operating multi-agent or tool-using AI systems in production
- What Croutons evaluates
- Unnecessary model calls
- Retry loops
- Agent execution depth
- Tool-call amplification
- Retrieval fan-out per task
- Inputs required
- End-to-end traces for completed tasks
- Agent/planner configuration
- Tool and retrieval inventories
- Retry and timeout policies
- Method
- Reconstruct fan-out for representative tasks. Attribute amplification to planner depth, retries, tools, and retrieval. Recommend depth limits, reuse, and gating controls.
- Deliverables
- Fan-out map for sample tasks
- Amplification drivers ranked
- Recommended depth and retry controls
- Pilot measurement plan
- Expected outcome
- Lower waste per completed task through controlled execution depth — not guaranteed absolute cost floors.
- Limitations
- Requires traces that show the full agent path
- Does not rewrite agent frameworks
- Some fan-out is necessary for quality; analysis separates waste from required work
- Evidence or claim basis
Approved Croutons inference-diagnosis methodology
No external evidence sources attached. Claims rest on the approved internal methodology above. Repository file paths are content sources, not factual provenance.
Reviewed 2026-07-18 · Croutons product · status: supported
Run a diagnosis
Share sample logs, traces, workflows, or outputs. No production integration required for the first diagnosis.